Full-Speed-Ahead-SLK-Handlebar-31.8-mm-Flat-Handlebar-Carbon-Fiber-HB0506-MTB-Flat-Riser-Handlebar

SKU: HB0506

FSA SLK Low Rise Handlebar 31.8 Clamp 760mm Width 9° Back Black Carbon Fiber MTB

Full Speed Ahead
$122.89
$122.89 $123.10
Sale Sold out
/
Shipping calculated at checkout.
🚚 Order within the next 2 hours, 15 minutes for delivery by 01 Oct, 2024.

Fast & Free Shipping

Chat with Support for Expert Advice

Manufacturer Warranty

This is a pre order item. We will ship it when it comes in stock.
Specifications

Bar Clamp Diameter (mm)31.8 mm
ColorBlack
Width760 mm
Rise18 mm
Back Sweep (deg)9 deg
Upsweep4
Weight237 g
MaterialCarbon

FSA SLK mountain bars feature CSI (Carbon Structural Integration) construction that marries the best of both worlds in carbon and aluminum construction. The carbon helps keep the vibration to a minimum, while the aluminum core maintains a majority of the strength.

  • UD carbon and AL-6066 material
  • Carbon Structural Integration (CSI)
  • UD Carbon finish
Description

FSA SLK mountain bars feature CSI (Carbon Structural Integration) construction that marries the best of both worlds in carbon and aluminum construction. The carbon helps keep the vibration to a minimum, while the aluminum core maintains a majority of the strength.

  • UD carbon and AL-6066 material
  • Carbon Structural Integration (CSI)
  • UD Carbon finish

Customer Reviews

Based on 3 reviews
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
100%
(3)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
j
jmrco

I had to replace the Bontrager RXL full-carbon bar on my Trek Fuel EX 9.8. The RXL was stiff but unobtrusively so. It damped impacts and buzz from rocks very well while communicating everything I needed to know about what I was rolling over. Subjectively it was like the bar wasn't there as the communication was telepathic. I was intrigued by the composite alloy/carbon construction of the SL-K and put this bar on. It is very light stiff and communicative. Unfortunately I am aware of the bar at all times as transmits a lot of large and small impacts to my hands. I anticipate that this will be fatiguing when I do longer rides again. The SL-K may be a nice step up from alloy bars but it is not on par with the full-carbon RXL.

j
jmrco

I had to replace the Bontrager RXL full-carbon bar on my Trek Fuel EX 9.8. The RXL was stiff but unobtrusively so. It damped impacts and buzz from rocks very well while communicating everything I needed to know about what I was rolling over. Subjectively it was like the bar wasn't there as the communication was telepathic. I was intrigued by the composite alloy/carbon construction of the SL-K and put this bar on. It is very light stiff and communicative. Unfortunately I am aware of the bar at all times as transmits a lot of large and small impacts to my hands. I anticipate that this will be fatiguing when I do longer rides again. The SL-K may be a nice step up from alloy bars but it is not on par with the full-carbon RXL.

j
jmrco

I had to replace the Bontrager RXL full-carbon bar on my Trek Fuel EX 9.8. The RXL was stiff but unobtrusively so. It damped impacts and buzz from rocks very well while communicating everything I needed to know about what I was rolling over. Subjectively it was like the bar wasn't there as the communication was telepathic. I was intrigued by the composite alloy/carbon construction of the SL-K and put this bar on. It is very light stiff and communicative. Unfortunately I am aware of the bar at all times as transmits a lot of large and small impacts to my hands. I anticipate that this will be fatiguing when I do longer rides again. The SL-K may be a nice step up from alloy bars but it is not on par with the full-carbon RXL.;